Detailsview updating newvalues adult sex dating in hazleton indiana
Parameter name: index Source Error: Line 32: Dim my Drop Down List As Drop Down List Line 33: my Drop Down List = CType(Details View1. Line: 34 ****** Here is my method that is being referenced in the error: Protected Sub Details View1_Item Updating(By Val sender As Object, By Val e As System. Find Control("Drop Down List1"), Drop Down List) e. Find Control("Drop Down List1"), Drop Down List)Line 34: e. Why would the count only be 7 or 8 when there are obviously more than 10 records? through an editable control for example), so when Item Updating fires, the parameter is not listed in the New Values collection yet, allowing your code to actually add it. Cheers, Imar --------------------------------------- Imar Spaanjaars ) Specified argument was out of the range of valid values. Find Control("File Upload1"), File Upload) If my File Upload. Delete(Map Path("~/Paintings/") & old File Name) my File Upload. Just for fun, try setting one of the other parameters (if you have any) that are already set by the UI. Hi,could anybody tell me what did I wrong and why the oldvalues and newvalues collections of Details View Update Event Args in Item Updating method are containing the same collection of values even if I change them on the page in Details View form ? However, Command Arguments come from database to linkbutton. Hello, the Details View will renders as a table ,and its layout is not flexible enough , this is why the Form View Exists, its the same as Details View , but it has a flexible Layout , so the Form View is the b...I assumed the new Values should be those I previously filled in into the textboxes before I catched the On Item Updating event :-(Any advise would be appreciated Hi,akosko: Would you plz post some relative code here for further discussing? Andwhen one of these command buttons is cliked it must go to proper page. How do the different data presentation controls equate in ADO.net? All I want to do is intercept the New Values and put them in my custom data solution.
Selected Value) I thought that this would put the value into Ptype for the currently selected item. So, I thought that if there were 12 records in my detailsview, there would be 12 "newvalues"..so, I thought e. Intelli Sense for New Values might have revealed that: "Gets a dictionary that contains the new field name/value pairs for the record to update" Imar --------------------------------------- Imar Spaanjaars Cheers, Imar --------------------------------------- Imar Spaanjaars I actually debugged and even though I had e.newvalues(e.commandargument, "ptype", dropdownlist1.selectedvalue) which translated to (1, "ptype", 20) where 20 is and id to a table value and 1 is the second field (0-based array) of the record which is not ptype---it still passed the right parameters into my object.
This is a community of tens of thousands of software programmers and website developers including Wrox book authors and readers. By joining today you can post your own programming questions, respond to other developers’ questions, and eliminate the ads that are displayed to guests. At the bottom, it has them indexed by 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... Once you add the same key again using Insert, you get an error.
NET 2.0 Basics section of the Wrox Programmer to Programmer discussions. When I try editing the 9th element on, I get the following error: (Note: the Details View obiviously has more than 8 records. Ht H, Imar --------------------------------------- Imar Spaanjaars My logic was obviously wrong for editing..would I need to change it to so that the current item being "updated" will have the selected value from the dropdown input into "ptype"--and.did it work for the first 8 items the way I have it? Rob Then when the updating event fires, you can do something like this: Protected Sub Details View1_Item Updating(By Val sender As Object, _ By Val e As System. I must assume that by "insert" all it did was reposition the "ptype" field in the parameters.it got about the amount of parameters being passed--it errored. The New Values collection is an Ordered Dictionary that only allows unique keys.
Newvalues represented each record that was returned--not the fields of a record that is being updated. Remember, the Details View, while capable of displaying multiple, pageable records, only works with one record at the time. It worked while your record index was less than the number of properties / columns in your data source. Or, does it replace the existing parameter with the "new" one. Let's say my parameters were: fname = Rob mname = John lname = Searing state = KS and I do e.newvalues.insert(0, "lname", "Spaanjaars") will that replace the "fname" parameter with "lname" (because fname is the 0-placed parameter--and I am performing an insert into the "0" position with a different parameter name "lname" The reason I ask is because "ptype" was not the "0" position element in the record..filename was..the filename didn't change with e.newvalues.insert(e.commandargment, "ptype", dropdownlist.selectedvalue).fact everything worked liked I wanted it to..when I try editing the "second" record-which would have resulted in e.newvalues.insert(1, "ptype", value) or the third, which would be e.newvalues.insert(2, "ptype", value)..always updated perfectly..sure why. I am still curious about the behavior and why, what I describe above, worked.
NET 2.0 Instant Results and Beginning Dreamweaver MX / MX 2004I think so.. I think my biggest problem was that I thought that e. Selected Value) Where e.command Argument was the "selected record" (ie the 9th record) and that e. Insert would insert the value of the selected dropdown and put it into "ptype" for the "9th" record) Obviously, my logic was skewed..not sure why this actually worked for the first 8 records (first 8 paintings) that were returned. However, New Values contains the new values for the current record being updated, giving you a chance to modify the current data before it gets sent to the data source. NET 2.0 Instant Results and Beginning Dreamweaver MX / MX 2004While reading your original post again, I see what the problem is: e. Command Argument contains the zero-based index of the *record* in the Details View). You used the record index to determine a property index. Last question--so if it was creating a new parameter--would it matter what the size of the e.newvalues was?